The religious leader with the largest following is always considered the greater authority

Sopra the case of per Biblical law, the stricter opinion is always followed, even if it is that of the lesser of two authorities.

However, if two authorities have an equal following, the one generally recognized as per superior scholar is considered the greater.

It is forbidden for per student esatto oppose his teacher. Therefore, the opinion of verso student who opposes his teacher is never followed. This is even true when the student has verso stricter opinion per the case of Biblical law.

This, however, is only true during the lifetime of the teacher. After his death, his students are per niente different from any other independent scholars. Similarly, if per student surpasses his specializzazione per scholarship, he is no longer subservient to his master’s opinions.

It is written, “You shall indirizzato after per majority” (Exodus 23:2). Although this commandment relates specifically puro the Sanhedrin, it also applies puro any controversy between religious leaders. In particular, if an individual opinion is opposed by that of the majority, the former is ignored.

The authority of per community rabbi depends on his general acceptance

Therefore, if two factions oppose each other in verso question of law, the opinion of the faction including the greatest number of sages is that which must be followed. However, if it is well established that the smaller group is superior sopra wisdom and scholarship, then its opinion must be followed. Wisdom takes precedence over number.

Torah law depends on legal precedent rather than on historical scholarship. Therefore, it is usually the most recent valid decision that is followed. This is even true when it disputes an earlier majority.

However, a later authority is only followed when he is known sicuro be fully aware of the earlier decision and worthy of disputing it. Moreover, he must refute the earlier biguous proof rather than with mere logic. When the earlier opinion is not generally known, however, it can be assumed that the later authority would have accepted it if he would have been aware of it; therefore, the earlier opinion can be followed.

However, con per question of rabbinical law, the opinion of the greater authority is followed, whether it is stricter or more lenient

The rabbi of verso community may even reverse the decisions of his predecessors. This is true even if the current rabbi’s decisions are more lenient.

If the community rabbi is per recognized Torah authority, he must be followed, even when he disagrees with the majority of contemporary rabbis.

Mediante all such cases, the rabbi must depend on his own judgment. He can be secure per the promise of divine guidance, as it is written, “Consider what you do, for you judge not for man, but for God, and He is with you in your decision” (2 Chronicles 19:6).

Therefore, other religious scholars living durante the community may follow stricter opinions according to their own judgment. However, they may not openly oppose the community rabbi or publicly monitor their dissent.

If there are many Torah scholars mediante the community who disagree with the rabbi, he should yield preciso the opinion of the majority. This is only true, however, where the majority are the rabbi’s equals durante wisdom and Torah knowledge. Under no condition should the rabbi yield sicuro the ignorant laity durante any question of Torah law, per niente matter how great their number.

Sopra rendering a decision, verso rabbi must carefully consider all its aspects. Wherever possible, he should strive to find a precedent for his decisions from the opinions of earlier authorities.